![]() The leaving of the devices was “not an isolated event” since Michael Broddle, with the assistance of his sons, had been conducting research and surveillance on the two barristers and their respective families for at least six months beforehand, the jury was told.įarrelly said that a recording from Michael Broddle’s mobile phone, on, showed a note being left at the entrance to Sutcliffe’s home, directed at his daughter, which said: “Either Sooty QC stops digging his own grave or you will be raped whilst we dig up your brother grave.” The court heard both devices were accompanied by envelopes or packages with Sutcliffe’s name on them – one with a note containing a serious, false allegation against him – indicating that he was the “clear target” of events designed to “specifically cause him alarm, distress and public and professional embarrassment”. The other was not but “clearly designed to have the appearance of an improvised explosive device”. ![]() ![]() She said that forensic analysis suggested that the device left close to the bench was “potentially viable”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |